Do you know about - The Place of Ethical Concerns in science of mind
Health Insurance! Again, for I know. Ready to share new things that are useful. You and your friends.
Ethics plays an leading role in science of mind from the beginning of the medicine process straight through rehabilitation. There are many ethical concerns that can arise all of which must be dealt with along the way. These discrete concerns can also vary from one psychological setting to another. These settings include: hospitals, corporeal recovery centers and facilities specializing in persisting diseases to name only a few. As the estimate of psychologists and other professionals working in this field increases, so does the need to focus on areas of ethical concern (Lucignano and Lee). The ethical issues that can arise reach far beyond the healing setting and are gift in other situations as well.
What I said. It is not outcome that the real about Health Insurance. You see this article for information about a person need to know is Health Insurance.How is The Place of Ethical Concerns in science of mind
Important Ethical concerns include: role delineation, working within the healing model, taking on manifold responsibilities and maintaining confidentiality (Lucignano and Lee). Before any ethical issue can be recognized it must first be clearly defined. Though this report cannot encompass them all, those listed here are generally encountered and must be dealt with on a quarterly basis.
The first ethical concern that will be discussed is role delineation. This is a primary concern because it lays the ground work for the responsibilities and expectations of the psychologist; however, there is not a consensus on specifically what constitutes the role of the psychologist in a healing setting. Since many psychologists work in the healing profession, this can gift somewhat of a gray area. Instead, diverse terminology has often been used to define this singular role. Terms used include: condition psychology, healing psychology, clinical science of mind and behavioral medicine. This has presented past arguments over either or not this lack of clarity in actual definition of terms is more than semantic blurring (Lucignano and Lee). The primary seminar here is either a psychologists' actions and activities are included under one of these terms that are, for the most part, determined to be unstandardized in this context.
Working within the healing model is other ethical concern that must be determined in the healing field. In these instances, psychologists are usually working on teams that include a physician, group worker, speech pathologist, corporeal therapist and occupational therapist. Though all teams may not include every role listed above, it is very likely there will be at least two members on each. When this is the case, it is valuable for each man to work within his or her role in order to contribute maximum treatment. Ethical awareness is an valuable part of providing psychological medicine within the healing model. In a hospital, for instance, unique areas of stress may be gift which result both patients and members of the medicine team (Lucignano and Lee). As a result, there may be difficulties when it comes to the comprehensive decision making process. There may be several causes for this because many citizen are working to rehabilitate one person. There are several patients so that team may, in effect, be responsible for rehabilitating a wide range of citizen all of whom are dealing with very separate situations. Team members will not all the time agree on everything and leading issues may need to be determined examined by each team member when it comes to resolving them.
Taking on manifold responsibilities can also bring up ethical issues for psychologists no matter where they work. When treating patients, psychologists take a look at each as an personel and treat each situation accordingly. There are, of course, many responsibilities that come with providing medicine and the clarification to a singular need may not all the time coincide with primary means and methods of resolution. A psychologist in this type of situation may feel pressured by the many responsibilities he or she must tackle on a daily basis and may be torn between handling a definite one straight through primary means or in a way that is unique to the situation. The more executive duties the psychologist is given, the less time he or she will be able to spend rehabilitating patients. While this may not be an issue that is of top concern, it can arise nonetheless and will need to be dealt with in a way that allows the psychologist to take care of leading job-related duties and contribute the best medicine inherent to all patients.
Maintaining confidentiality is a very leading concern. While psychologists don't have a question retention leading patient details confined within the facilities with which they are employed, ethical issues can arise when it becomes valuable to discuss clear situations with other professionals. When this occurs, the psychologist complicated must settle either or not the information needs to be passed onto the man requesting it or if a singular piece of information needs to be disseminated to man else for medicine purposes.
In other situations, a psychologist may be asked for definite information about a current or old patient. While the information in question may be leading in the given context, the confidentiality of the patient may be breeched if it is provided. Here the psychologist is faced with a moral dilemma of sorts. He or she knows the information is leading and the man requesting it probably should be made aware, but is under a pro obligation to the patient to keep from sharing it. Should this occur, the psychologist can talk to the patient about the situation, informing him or her of the request and why it was made. The final decision of either or not to contribute the information will then be left up to the patient who will be responsible for its dissemination should this be the end result.
When it comes to solving ethical dilemmas, it is leading to first understand the code that has been established. When going to work for a singular entity, psychologists will receive information that will instruct them on the discrete policies and regulations. In order to solve the issues that are bound to arise at one time or another, they will need to correlate the personel situations and make a determination on what to do based on the ethical law that have been set forth. Some dilemmas will be easier to solve than others and will be based colse to more black and white issues of right and wrong. Other times, distinguishing between right and wrong will not be so easy to do. In some cases, the rejoinder will not lie in a straightforward context of right and wrong, but instead will be definite to the discrete factors involved. When this occurs it is often not quite so easy to make the determinations that solve these ethical dilemmas. When this happens, psychologists depend heavily on the ethical law they have learned as well as the definite policies established by the entities for which they are employed.
One base question that occurs is in solving singular ethical dilemmas by using the law when the situation is not completely clear. Sometimes problems arise that call for comprehensive decision making based on personel factors that cannot be figured into the primary ethical principles. Each situation is separate and must be treated as such and therefore, will have an personel set of issues that may arise. When this occurs, the psychologist must make a determination based on the definite factors complicated while using the ethical law in a way that will solve the question without causing an ethical conflict.
Ethics are gift for a reason. They are valuable when solving a wide variety of problems that may arise on an personel basis. Though these issue are just that, individual, a uniform code is needed to help psychologists understand and deal with clear types of situations. The place of ethical concerns in science of mind applies to psychologists both as researchers and practitioners. Ethics are gift in every aspect of psychological practices and must be adhered to in every context. A set of ethical guidelines has been established to aid psychologists in figuring out what to do when these situations arise. All psychologists are bound by these guidelines.
Though ethical guidelines have been established, there is often a consider on either or not clear issues fall within them and what psychologists should don when they occur. Still, the place of ethics in science of mind is not newly found. Aristotle made several leading psychological observations concerning the limits beyond which humans cannot operate their own behavior, sanity and their capacity for emotional response (Upton). Though these law have been studied for many years, other issues have arisen definite to new situations and debates. That is why comprehension the code of ethics and why it has been established is valuable to solving discrete issues that can, and often do occur.
The code of ethics outlines the responsibilities of the psychologist and establishes what is determined acceptable and unacceptable in regards to the institution of psychology. This code of ethics is multi-dimensional and must be adhered to in order for a science of mind to mouth his or her license (Kafka). Since licenses are granted by each personel state of residence, a psychologist working in any singular location is bound by the definite practices established in that place. This institution is defined straight through roles and obligations a psychologist will possess so there will be consistency within the field. Likewise, the license a psychologist obtains will have meaning to the group who can admittedly learn what is improbable of a pro working in the field.
The main goal is the psychological code of ethics is to insure that all clients and patients are treated in a professional, legal and respectful manner when seeking medicine (Kafka). Here behaviors are defined that specify how the psychologist will cope the discrete situations that may arise while the course of medicine for all clients or patients. The ethical code regulates the way in which many behaviors are dealt with and how situations may be resolved. This includes both the underground and institutional institution of psychology. This guarantees that anything who receives assistance from a psychologist who is adhering to the code of ethics is insured professional, humane medicine that causes no psychological or corporeal harm. Should the ethical code be breeched for any reason, the situation is investigated and handled accordingly.
The code of ethics is also designed to protect the group from uses and abuses that may result from the mishandling of a singular situation. These protections include: physical, emotional or even financial and cover a wide range of factors related to the institution of psychology. The code contains numerous clauses that clearly specify practices that are determined to be acceptable in regards to billing procedures, file maintenance procedures and even what should occur while acceptable therapy termination. Many aspects include: job handling, office administration and client handling. The acceptable versus unacceptable behaviors are defined as well as what actions should be taken if any part of the code is breeched.
The code of ethics directs both the psychologist and client or patient away from conflicts of interest. The existence of dual roles is one friction that can occur when inappropriate relationships are established between psychologists and those they serve. The ethical code specifies how these situations should be handles and helps both parties in maintaining lawful, socially responsible behavior. This insures the psychologist will be able to treat clients or patients in a clear manner that will promote recovery while clearly drawing the line for those receiving the medicine that clearly defines the acceptable association of psychologist and patient. While there may be many arguments surrounding definite situations and what admittedly constitutes an ethical dilemma, the code is clearly defined and should be closely followed at all times. There are many situations that can admittedly gift ethical dilemmas, but the code remains in place to help guide psychologists when they must deal with issues that may prove rather difficult. This well-established code not only serves as a guide but also as a way of protecting everybody complicated in the medicine process. The ethical code is an leading part of the psychological institution because it clearly defines how to deal with leading issues that can arise while the course of treatment. This aids psychologists in making leading decisions and helps them to good understand the psychological pro as a whole.
References
Kafka, Pauline. May 7, 2008. Psychologist Code of Ethics
Understanding the pro escort of Psychologists. Taken from http://clinical-psychology.suite101.com/article.cfm/psychologist_as_professional
Lucignano, Geraldine, Lee, Sandra. Ethical Issues complicated in the Role of Psychologists in healing Settings. Taken from http://www.questia.com/Pm.qst?a=o&se=gglsc&d=5002168429.
Upton, Candace L. The Journal of Ethics. Virtue Ethics and Moral Psychology: The Situationism Debate. Taken from scienceofvirtues.org.
I hope you get new knowledge about Health Insurance. Where you possibly can put to use within your day-to-day life. And most importantly, your reaction is Health Insurance.Read more.. The Place of Ethical Concerns in science of mind. View Related articles related to Health Insurance. I Roll below. I even have counseled my friends to help share the Facebook Twitter Like Tweet. Can you share The Place of Ethical Concerns in science of mind.
No comments:
Post a Comment